Searching for

About
Awards
Fellows
Events
News
Contact
Support
Current
All
About
Awards
Fellows
Events
News
Contact
Support
Current
All

SOM Foundation
224 South Michigan Avenue
Chicago, IL 60604

Terms of Use
Join Our Mailing List

Searching for

About
Awards
Fellows
Events
News
Contact
Support
Current
All

2017 Structural Engineering Traveling Fellowship
The Shape of Innovation: Deriving Structural Art from Geometric Form

As part of “The Shape of Innovation: Deriving Structural Art from Geometric Form,” Leah Peker traveled to structures from different eras and different cultural backgrounds to identify unifying themes in the mathematical mindset. As she visited various sites, she acquired a deeper understanding of how “geometric form as the root of a structure” influences the structural and architectural landscape.

Leah Peker
Columbia University
Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics

View Application Essay
View Final Report

Somf structural engineering leah peker 10 2017

Hipódromo de la Zarzuela, Madrid, Spain. © Leah Peker.

Jury
Gianluca Cusatis
Salvatore Di Bernardo
Robert A. Halvorson
David Horos (Chair)
Mark P. Sexton

Geometric form is the fundamental concept driving this study. I was guided by a few simple questions: How does one achieve true structural innovation? Are some geometric forms better than others? To what extent does the final form impact the structure’s functionality? How have geometric forms evolved? How has their evolution benefited structures?

I have selected a collection of structures on five continents that rely on their geometric form as the foundation for economy, efficiency, and elegance. Some have ostensibly observable forms, while others require a bit more digging.

I have aimed to identify and explain the geometry and how it was implemented in each structure, in addition to the purpose it serves for that structure.

I have not made a declaration for whether each structure qualifies as structural art. The goal for me was not so much to paint a black and white depiction of structural art, but to open an investigation and dialogue, which I hope will be ongoing.

The investigation was centered on exposing the beauty of structures, the ingenuity of countless engineers, and the achievements made possible through experimentation and expansion of the concepts of structural art. In the collection that follows, I hope to deconstruct the geometric concepts and forms through which great engineers have derived structural art.

Somf structural engineering leah peker 04 2017

Capilla de Gimnasio Moderno, Bogotá, Colombia. © Leah Peker.

Somf structural engineering leah peker 05 2017

Capilla de Gimnasio Moderno, Bogotá, Colombia. © Leah Peker.

Somf structural engineering leah peker 06 2017

Capilla de Gimnasio Moderno, Bogotá, Colombia. © Leah Peker.

Salginatobel, Schiers, Switzerland. © Leah Peker.

Somf structural engineering leah peker 07 2017

Baochu Pagoda, Hangzhou, China. © Leah Peker.

Somf structural engineering leah peker 08 2017

Khajuraho Group of Monuments, Chhatarpur, India. © Leah Peker.

Somf structural engineering leah peker 09 2017

Conclusion

Throughout the process of applying for the SOM Foundation fellowship, traveling, returning home to the United States, working, and writing this book, I have learned much about structures and engineering, about the world, and about my place in it. By far, the most important lesson has been that simplicity is key.

When I chose structures to visit, I was looking at those that had very apparent geometries. Though I tried, I did not always adequately consider the distinction between the geometry and design being birthed and grown together, as opposed to a design forcing itself into a desired geometric outcome. This is what I meant when I set my intention to study “geometry as the root of the structure.” After visiting the structures on my list, however, the distinction became apparent.

Not all structures that are ostensibly inscribing shapes are designed rooted in geometric form. As a result, not all are designed with economy and efficiency in mind. Within the context of structural art, brute force easily becomes a fatal flaw.

On the contrary, complexity is beautiful when it is rooted in the simplicity of a repeatable form, or in the natural shapes of compression and tensile structures.

Complexity is sometimes unavoidable. When designing small single-story buildings, a designer has more flexibility to experiment with forms and increase a structure’s efficiency with forms that enhance its elegance.

As a building’s purpose becomes more convoluted, such as in a commercial high-rise, the structure must accommodate additional design concerns that make it difficult to rationalize the developed needs with a pure geometric form of structural art.

Conceptually, this notion is not limited to structures. When we look at the world at large, the metaphor translates to art, politics, and philosophy. Sometimes we have to return to the basics to perfect the root of our form. Only then can we build. A statue falls without a strong pedestal. An ideology fails without clear definition. A structure loses that which makes it art.

We are at a place and time in history in which situations have become increasingly convoluted. Antiquated laws punish people for the wrong reasons. New laws are passed to criminalize that which should be considered human rights. Old habits and ways of thinking hinder progress. Blind consumption drives pollution and accelerates climate change. As a civilization, we open wounds, ignoring those that are already crying out for bandages.

Yet, we are also in a time of progress. Companies are emerging whose practices prioritize fair treatment for humans and animals, considering compassion and community. Politicians are stepping into the political battlefield representing a range of religion, race, and gender, challenging the status quo. People are opening their eyes, realizing each individual’s significance and power, using their voices and power of choice to support groups and movements that aim to benefit the public as a whole.

We are saying no to institutionalism and propaganda, and instead are acknowledging the greater good.

What does this have to do with structural art? Everything. Structures are vital to the built world around us. They facilitate movements by forming the spaces within which they begin; by bridging rivers and valleys to carry voice across divides. They inspire. They inspire us to do better, to be better.

They have a cost. Construction contributes to pollution. Materials must be mined, milled, and transported. All of this requires fuel, machinery, and functioning with industrialization era practices. The rapid growth of urbanism and rapid expansion within the construction industry to accommodate the building needs has directed an emphasis toward quick, cheap construction. Inefficiency at all stages of the process leads to waste, exacerbating the problem.

Experimentation rooted in structural art is vital to ensure that the social, environmental, and political impacts of structure are thoroughly considered. Experimentation into new materials must continue so that we may find materials that reduce the pollution caused by major urban construction. Experimentation into new forms, so that each material’s strengths are utilized. We must experiment so that the drive to cut monetary costs does not endlessly continue to raise material, environmental, and social costs.

We must always remember that structural art exists not only for the sake of aesthetic value, but for innovative solutions that lead to structurally informed beautiful structures, built for the betterment of society as a whole.

When we build structures as structural art, we are not only building a tower, or a bridge, or a home; we are building a community, an ideology, a civilization. We are building technological advance, materials research, and progress. Inspiring awe, inspiring hope, inspiring ambition. We are building the future by building for the humanity we seek out in the present.

Somf structural engineering leah peker 01 2017

Sagrada Familia, Barcelona, Spain. © Leah Peker.

Somf structural engineering leah peker 03 2017

Sagrada Familia, Barcelona, Spain. © Leah Peker.

Somf structural engineering leah peker 02 2017

Sagrada Familia, Barcelona, Spain. © Leah Peker.

Itinerary

London, United Kingdom 30 St. Mary Axe
Paris, France Eiffel Tower
Normandy, France St. Pierre du Vauvray Bridge
Munich, Germany Olimpiastadion
Reichenau, Switzerland Reichenau Bridge
Schiers, Switzerland Salginatobel Bridge
Geneva, Switzerland Sicli Building
Rome, Italy Pantheon / Palazetto Dello Sport
Barcelona, Spain Escuela de la Sagrada Familia
Madrid, Spain Hipódromo de la Zarzuela
Istanbul, Turkey Hagia Sophia
Shanghai, China Shanghai Tower
Hangzhou, China Baodu Pagoda
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Petronas Towers
Siem Reap, Cambodia Angor Wat
Dhaka, Bangladesh National Assembly
Chattapur, India Khajuraho Group of Temples
Sydney, Australia Sydney Opera House
Melbourne, Australia Sidney Myer Music Bowl
Atlántida, Uruguay Iglesia de Cristo Obrero
Brasília, Brazil Cathedral de Brasília
Bogotá, Colombia Capilla de Gimnasio Moderno
Mexico City, Mexico Los Manantiales
Denver, Colorado, United States Denver International Airport
St. Louis, Missouri, United States Gateway Arch
Montreal, Canada Biosphère
Chicago, Illinois, United States John Hancock Center

France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United Kingdom

Australia, Bangladesh, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, India, Malaysia, Mexico, the United States, and Uruguay

Somf structural engineering leah peker 2017 02

Leah Peker
Columbia University
Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics

Leah Peker

was raised on Long Island, New York, where she began to develop her love for the aesthetic and interest in both the physical form of space and its effect on human experience. As a child, Peker’s father—an architect who emigrated from Turkey—exposed her to the world of structures. This passion followed her into adulthood. After receiving an International Baccalaureate Diploma from Commack High School, Peker went on to earn her Bachelor of Science in Physics at the University of Pittsburgh in 2014. As an undergraduate, she worked in Hrvoje Petek’s solid state physics lab. There, she studied carbon capture on organic molecules in pursuit of a potential application to reduce atmospheric carbon. In 2013 she was awarded the Emil Sanielevici Memorial Scholarship for her research. This research in sustainability combined with her passion for architecture led her in the direction of structural engineering. Peker will graduate from Columbia University with a Master of Science in Structural Engineering in May 2017. Combining work and academia, she has spent the better part of a year interning at Severud Associates, where she has gained her first hands-on experience as an engineer. Both settings have given her the opportunity to learn from visionary engineers who inspire by example.

©2025 SOM Foundation

Terms of Use

Join Our Mailing List