Codes and Uncertainty
Codes act as a crucial link between the government and the built environment in response to crises. Throughout history, various crises in Hong Kong have prompted revisions and updates to codes, addressing safety, public health, and other concerns. After the first code was issued in 1856, codes were revised and updated following various crises. For example, the major fire disaster between 1851 and 1868 led to codes about safety, and the bubonic plague in 1894 led to public health and building ordinances. The government’s attitude toward crisis and uncertainty is solidified through the establishment of codes, which are then reflected in the built environment.
However, while existing housing buildings represent certainty, they face the challenge of adapting to changing codes that respond to the uncertain environment. In my studio work, I explore innovative living concepts and challenge codes in high-rise design. During this process, I think about the underlying reasons for the implementation of certain codes—what events or crises led to the release of new codes, what concerns of the government led to certain requirements, and what is the purpose of giving the bonus of Gross Floor Area (GFA). I also explore the relationship between crisis, code, and cliché in the context of the uncertainty of Hong Kong: how crisis shape the evolving codes, how the bonus of GFA becomes a trigger for clichés, and how peculiar clichés shape Hong Kong’s architectural identity under extreme pragmatism and unwavering pursuit of economic efficiency. It is with a better understanding of codes that we understand the context of a site (which shapes code), the potential of architecture (which code constrains), and the role of the architect (who may challenge code).
This proposal aims to confront this challenge, utilizing existing codes to navigate an uncertain environment and enable reconstruction in post-2024 housing architecture. By examining the underlying reasons behind the implementation of certain codes and understanding the relationship between crisis, code, and architectural identity, we can better comprehend the contextual factors that shape codes.